On Friday, May 10, 2002, at 07:37 AM, marktuckerdotcom wrote: > It is weird that you'd write this. Just yesterday, as I was > obsessing over this Canon D60 b/w file, thinking it looked too > clean and clinical and something else I couldn't quite put my > finger on, I added Noise (Monochromatic) to the image, and, > WALLAH!, it immediately turned into an romantic image that had > been shot with a 1955 Leica! . . . So, play around with Noise, and > compare it to Grain, and then > compare it to Film Grain. Each approach gives a slightly different If you aren't already familiar with them, you might find the Photoshop b&w filters produced by SilverOxide.com interesting. They are intended to convert digital photographs or scanned color images into black and white images with the tonal characteristics of a variety of specific b&w films. The SilverOxide website--www.silveroxide.com--is a little on the crude side, but it's clear enough about how the filters function. I think that all the illustrations they provide are based on their Tri-X filter. The filters don't address the grain issue (only the way that , say, Tri-X, HP5, Delta 400, T400CN, and APX400 respond differently to the same colors), but I thought they might be relevant to a discussion of the "unfilmlike" look of unadjusted digital b&w images. Dan Bowdoin
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: What if grain is "necessary"
2002-05-10 by Daniel Bowdoin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.