There was an article recently, last couple of issues ago, in Photo Techniques on making digital with Pictorico film. You might try their back issues and find the article. I just wish Paul would answer my post from Sunday Vinny - In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "donbga" <donbryant@w...> wrote: > > > > I said "sufficient quality " not sufficient range. > > > Sorry, a mental transpositon on my part! > > > I've had excellent results with a 1270, Epson inks and driver and > Pictorico > > film with negs for Platinum and Ziatype prints as well as silver MG > VI, > > Forte Polywarmtone and Berger papers. > > > > So you have sufficient density to make platinum prints? > Which processes have you used digital negatives for platinum > printing? Or did you mean a platinum/palladium combination? I'm not > trying to split hairs but rather discern what density range you are > getting with your physical density negatives. > > > I love Piezo and am one of it's greatest fans. But in my experience > even my > > 7000 with BWPro24 Piezo the dither pattern is far too discernable > for > > Pictorico. > > > > Yes (from what I have read) apparently the 0% dot gain causes the > dither to become quite obvious. > > > Maybe the MIS VM (which I also regularly use) may work and I hope > that you > > will post your results. > > > > Well I'm just crossing my fingers, but I'm pessimistic. It could be > that decent negatives for gum printing may be able to be made with > MIS-VM and the 1160. > > It may just turn out that digital inkjet negatives will be an > ellusive goal -- at least for me, for now. > > Don Bryant
Message
Re: Enlarged Digital Negatives
2002-06-17 by vinyo88
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.