On 7/7/02 10:49 AM, "tomoc" <TomOC@...> wrote: > I definitely agree that the new Piezotones are not neutral...I have > MIS FSN in one printer and the PT in another...huge difference in > tones. The MIS FSN inks aren't neutral either...they are significantly cool to my eye. I think neutral is in the eye of the beholder. That's why Cone called the first Piezotones Neutral-Warm and why another set of Piezotones to be released this summer will be called Neutral-Cool (I'd guess that these will be close in tonality to the FS-N set). The logic is that if people want to find "their neutral" they can mix...without having to make adjustments in curves...using either the piezo or imageprint drivers. While you could do this in the past with the FS/FSN inks, this will be much better because neither the warm or cool inkset will warm appreciably...thus it will be much easier to find your best mix. The Seleniums are yet another set of tones and my guess is that there will also be a warm set in the not too distant future. While this isn't as flexible as the VM or small gamut approach which allows people to switch between tonalities on the same printer...it instead provides them the benefit of the easy piezo workflow and the large number of paper profiles. It is easy to switch between inks sets using my 7000 and actually I've recently considered maintaining multiple CIS systems for the different ink sets...then switching tonality is as easy as just replacing carts and doing a flush image or two. For me anyway...it was a welcome addition to the list of possibilities for quad printing. Robert
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Note on PiezoTones was Lyson vs. piezo inks
2002-07-07 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.