> EAM in my opinion (by a slight margin) but it's more expensive. I > suspect that it's from much cleaner stock than the Hahnemuhe version slight correction to my last post: I meant that the Hahnemuhe PR probably comes from cleaner stock than the EAM. Which is not dissing the EAM. I do really think that the EAM is competent but it has a rather subdued look in its tonality relative to the luxury beauty of PR!
Message
Re: [Digital BW] "PR" or "EAM"?
2002-08-27 by wangalb