Sunday, September 1, 2002, 11:58:44 PM, Robert Morrison wrote: RM> It stinks with the quad pigment blacks...poor rub off and soft image...this RM> is a made for dye paper. The gallerie smooth pearl has similar RM> problems...but works with epson pigments. The best E surface papers out RM> there for BW quad are Bightcube Semi-Matte and Generations Prophoto RM> lustre...but both need to be sprayed. RM> Robert Robert, I've read similar reports as you describe but I went ahead anyway tonight and tried printing on Ilford Gallerie Classic Pearl (inkjet paper) with my 1160 and MIS FS-N and they look great! There's a small bit of what looks like bleeding on the edges of the image, which would have me thinking the rest would be similarly bleeding and result in a soft image, but it has not significantly. Let me put it this way: if the print on EAM represented sharpness on a scale at 100, the sharpness of the same print on the Pearl is 90. I'd say it has held it's sharpness quite well when compared to the same image printed on EAM as you must hold them very close and side by side to see any real difference. The blacks are not as black as with EAM but still quite nice. I'll let them "cure" overnight and see what I find in the morning. But so far am very pleased: a semi-matte, pearl finish for my quadtones prints. Best regards, Richard mailto:richard@...
Message
Re[2]: [Digital BW] Glossy prints (was Is anyone really thrilled? Honest)
2002-09-02 by Richard Sintchak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.