Saturday, September 7, 2002, 8:46:25 AM, rlsopher wrote: r> This is definitely off list topic but what the heck... r> I need a new back up for my F4. The F100 has been suggested as a r> good way to go but I can get a used F4 in excellent + condition for r> about the same price. r> Does anyone use the F100; what do you think of it? r> Thanks, r> Roger I do not know your shooting conditions or style. However, while having a back-up identical body is nice in 22 years I've only needed to use my back-up 3-4 times. The idea of a back-up to me is that it's a light-weight camera that while not 100% of your main camera will still allow you to shoot and complete a job with little problems. But in reality, if you take good care of your primary camera in regards to upkeep, cleaning, and the occasional but regular CLA, you'll hardly ever really need it. Carrying a extra F4 or F100 seems a little much to me. To me back-up includes the idea that it's there with you at the bottom of the camera bag but hardly noticeable. I'd recommend a lightweight FM2 or FE2 or even a real light FM10 (don't laugh, supposedly Galen Rowell used to carry one on occasion for back-up). And with the FM2 you'll have the added benefit that all shutter speeds work without batteries as well. The FE/FM2 or FM10 are a small fraction of the weight of an F4 or F100. Just a thought.... Best regards, Richard mailto:richard@...
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Nikon Back Up Body
2002-09-07 by Richard Sintchak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.