You might want to try the MIS VM inkset with Enhanced black from generations in the black position. It doesn't turn colors after 3 months in a sunny south window. Jerry. The enhanced black will give you great blacks, the VM black is not nearly as satisfying. chervinsky02144 wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to share with you the result of a rather primitive light > exposure experiment that I have done with Piezotone SE ink and > MIS FS ink on PhotoRag 308 paper. > > The images you are about to see were printed on two different > Epson 1160 printers, one with MIS FS ink the other with the > PiezoTone SE ink; the SE printer was flushed as per IJM's > instructions prior to cartridge installation. The Randall workflow > was used because it produces a much darker D-Max than the > Piezo driver; 2.00 compared to 1.77. The prints were taped to a > climate controlled office wall in a uniformly lit area. The office > has a large panel of windows leading to the outside and the > walls and ceiling are painted white; it is quite a bright room, > bright enough to not have to use the overhead lights at all. The > prints were taped to the wall adjacent to the windows > approximately two feet from them. At no time during the days of > the exposure did the prints see any direct sunlight; only reflected > light. The right side of each of the prints was covered with black > opaque paper taken from a box of old photographic paper for the > duration of the exposure. The prints were mounted from 8/15/02 > - 9/4/02 or three weeks total. Since the test, the prints were kept > in a dark drawer and scanned on 9/10/02 on a flatbed scanner. > Both prints were scanned in RGB color with the same scanning > parameters. > > The Piezotone SE image is here: > > http://users.rcn.com/chervinsky/Photography/People/PiezoSE.jpg > > The MIS FS image is here: > > http://users.rcn.com/chervinsky/Photography/People/MIS.jpg > > The D-Max of the PiezoTone SE print went from 2.0 to 1.63 in the > exposed area and stayed the same in the covered area. The > D-Max of the MIS print went from 1.73 to 1.72 in the exposed area > and stayed the same in the covered area. Densitometry > measurements were done with a calibrated X-Rite 810 > densitometer. > > Subjective Assessment: I am greatly impressed with the general > appearance of PeizoTone SE print as it comes out of the printer; > the blacks are just spectacular, MUCH better the MIS FS ink. I > am also impressed with the inks overall neutrality. I am, > however, quite disappointed with the inks lightfastness. Further, > when the PiezoTone ink fades it tends to turn pink. As I > mentioned earlier the office is bright but I do not believe that it > could be three stops brighter than display conditions. I worry that > after 6 months in display light that my prints will fade in a similar > way. > > I hope this has been helpful to all. > > Thanks for your time. > > -John Chervinsky > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Piezotone SE vs. MIS FS: See Posted Images
2002-09-10 by Jerry Olson
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.