Steve: I used to make "monochrome" prints using PS quadtones and tritones, and liked them a lot. At that time, I had tried the original Piezo inks and hated them, primarily because of the absence of the kind of deep black you can get with Epson dyes. When I first tried the selenium PiezoTones, I was initially put off by the same lack of deep black, although the chromatic complexity (as Martin Wesley puts it) of the selenium ink set was intriguing. After my first couple of carts, I was hooked. In my opinion, both the selenium and the warm neutral PiezoTones are beautiful, and the Piezo plug-in gives a level of shadow detail that is simply not available with the Epson driver. Now, of course, we have begun to realize that the PiezoTones may be too good to be true. For one thing, the more recent batches of 1280 carts have a strange light blue cast in certain midtones that is unacceptable. (On the other hand, most of my images are so dark that they are not affected by this problem.) For another, we now learn that the PT black can be expected to fade in unattractive ways, although I haven't seen it myself yet. Despite all this, however, I would not go back to Epson dyes and the Epson driver. Although I think the PS quadtone curves make good use of the Epson, blocked shadows and weird color shifts are inevitable. What's the alternative? My current contingency plan is to replace the PT black with Gen4 black, and to trust Jon Cone to make good his promise to replace the defective selenium 1280 carts. If this doesn't work - or maybe even if it does - my longterm plan is to migrate to a 7600 with IP5 and whatever ink set looks promising at that time. My dream is that the rumors of an Epson monochrome inkset for those printers come true. Hope this is helpful Chuck
Message
Re: PS Quadtones vs. a dedicated system
2002-09-12 by cschaible94111
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.