Wendel, A most important point which I should have made. The entire idea that photographs, works on paper, are some how supposed to be archivally eternal is pure nuttiness. About a year ago I spent an afternoon viewing photographs in the Stanford University collection. I actually got to hold a William Henry Fox Talbot print from the 1830's in my hands. The paper was in wonderful shape but the image was a soft magenta blur. Virtually all the prints representing the entire spectrum of photographic printing medium showed some examples of deteriorating from bug bites, water damage, fading, yellowing, strange discolorations, crease marks, etc. There were a few exceptions but not many. Things like some daguerreotypes under glass in small cases. Only with the modern prints done in the last 50 years did things look pretty pristine and in part I attribute that to the conservationists who have figured out how to properly store photographs. Make art and stop obsessing over whether it will still look good to people once you are dead! You will be lucky if they like while you are still alive. Martin Wesley http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wendel White" <wendel@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 4:11 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] EAM+Piezotones: Printer beware! > Martin, I would just add to this comment by saying that all "works on paper" > are generally considered to be among the most fragile and fugitive of the > art making processes. Of course even sculpture is susceptible to air > pollution and lack of proper care. > > Wendel > > > While some may fade, I also think that some will last and the deciding > > factor will be how they are displayed (or not) and stored. > > > > For myself I plan to continue on with the inkjet printing simply because I > > like the look and the process. I also hope that the ink technology will > > continue to improve and that within a relative short time we will have > > materials that inspire greater confidence and genuinely have a better chance > > of long survival. > > > > As for collectors who buy art as a business investment, I have little > > respect or interest, nor do I care if their investments fall off the paper. > > The only valid reason I see to purchase a piece of art is that you like it. > > Unfortunately large numbers of people seem to lack any self confidence in > > their own taste and need to be told what they like by art critics and > > galleries. My 2 cents. > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or &amp;quot;flames.&amp;quot; > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] EAM+Piezotones: Printer beware!
2002-09-12 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.