Frank, I have a 100 step greyscale I can email to you. I recommend you analyze the overall grey you are printing in a resolution finer than the 21 step chart. I am having a quite challenging time working on a set of curves for a 2000P using the MIS FSe inkset. Flat spots in the curve are much more visible in a real print than in that 21 step analysis. The graduated scales in the PiezoTest print are also valuable to ensure there smooth transitions. I think 8 bit i.e. 256 levels of grey ( 0.4 % steps ) are not your problem. Alex Orlando Fl --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "frankg_photo" <frank@f...> wrote: > Even with using 16 bit scans and doing the major curve/level adj > before switching to 8 bit, I still have a problem with posterisation > in areas of my prints. > > I have tried the same neg/scan on several paper samples I had (Royal > Renaissance (Photo Rag), Eclipse Satine Soft & the Bright, EAM) & > it's pretty much the same on all. > > I am using MIS sepia>neutral inkset in an 1160 with Paul's curves. > > In the past some have reported duplicating the background layer > and/or combining 2 curve adjustment layers and/or adjusing the > opacities - this is a muddle for me. > > can anyone clarify this workflow or suggest another way I can try and > beat the posterization blues > > thanks > Frankg
Message
Re: posterisation - how to defeat
2002-10-03 by B. Alex Pettit Jr.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.