Robert wrote: > ... >What about Legion Photo Matte? I don't think it does well with the >Ultrachromes...but it is acid free and has a smooth surface... >probably does ok with the FS/VM black. It is brightened like >crazy, though. I've had a box of LPM for some time, so the other day, in my frustration with EAM, I pulled it out to take a second look. The black with VM/FS-K is about 1.60 -- not as good as the old EAM, but about the same as the new batch of EAM that I sent back as "defective." (My new roll of EEM is better, but not as good as the best samples. I guess they all probably vary a bit.) However, LPM still does not get the nice smooth tones and transitions of EAM. Also, I noticed that I could not use the "Back Light Film" paper setting. It flooded the 100% patch and resulted in a Dmax that was less than the PQIJ paper setting -- more ink means lower Dmax in this case. The paper is really dense. I'd guess it is loaded with calcium carbonate buffer. I've read that some papers are fully 30% filler. I'm not sure printing on limestone is the answer. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Piezotone/Ultrachrome blacks was MIS inks - are they really pure pigment?
2002-10-04 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.