All, I am going back and forth between an old box of EAM and a new box of EEM. I see no difference in the paper or in the images whatsoever. My EAM profile works identically on EEM. The reason for switching between boxes is the missing logo on the EEM. :-) I am now using the old EAM box for proofs only. I would expect the EAM to ultimately be flushed out of all the food chains as it finally was at Atlex. Phil Morse Jerry Olson wrote: > > Hi Jo, > > I've been told that the two papers are identical, only the name changed > because the paper wasn't all that archival. However, depending on which > epson representative you talk to, you'll get many different answers. > They probably know far less about their products than most people on > this list. That paper is still the champ when it comes to quality/price/blacks. > > Jerry > > Jo Brunenberg wrote: > > > > Hi EAM users, > > > > At the Epson booth at Seybold San Francisco last autumn an Epson representative told me that the new Epson Enhanced Archival Matte was superior to the previous Epson Archival Matte
Message
Re: [Digital BW] EAM or Enhanced EAM?
2002-12-16 by Phil Morse
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.