> What is the realtionship between Portra and TCN 400??
I don't know, other than the Portra being sold only in a box of five
(35mm and 120). If you ever plan to print on photo paper, I recall that
Portra is intended to print only on color paper. I have used a lot of both
and like both. The Portra may have a little better tonal range. It does
seem to be a true 400 speed. In so far as I know, neither is "archival".
They are basically color neg films and not at all archival in the sense of
silver b&w film.
> There is one other disadvantage of chromogenic films -- you are dependent
on a
> processing lab. I just spent 15 minutes "cloning" scratches out of a
> file. It reminded me that one of the reasons I use standard B&W
> films is that I can develop them myself.
Absolutely. I have mine processed by a pro lab with a dip and dunk
line. Machine processing, for me, has pretty much been a disaster. BTW,
regarding cloning, it just dawned on me that the Healing Brush in PS7 is the
fastest way yet of spotting out dust.
Regards,
--Ken Carney
www.kencarney.comMessage
Re: [Digital BW] Re: B&W Chromogenics
2003-01-13 by Ken Carney
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.