Digital BW, The Print

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Shilesh Jani" 
<shilesh.jani@s...> wrote:
but not as low as EEM or Museo.
> 
> I printed the same image used in the recent Technical Exchange on 
(1) 
> EEM, (2) PhotoRag 308 gsm, (3) William Turner 190 gsm, and (4) 
Arches 
> Infinity smooth 230 gsm.  
> On a real photograph, once again, Infinity was virtually 
> indistinguishable from PhotoRag and William Turner (other than the 
> surface smoothness.
> 
Shilesh,
So, how did Arches Infinity compared to EEM ?
Cheers,
Andre