--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Shilesh Jani" <shilesh.jani@s...> wrote: but not as low as EEM or Museo. > > I printed the same image used in the recent Technical Exchange on (1) > EEM, (2) PhotoRag 308 gsm, (3) William Turner 190 gsm, and (4) Arches > Infinity smooth 230 gsm. > On a real photograph, once again, Infinity was virtually > indistinguishable from PhotoRag and William Turner (other than the > surface smoothness. > Shilesh, So, how did Arches Infinity compared to EEM ? Cheers, Andre
Message
Re: Arches Infinity - Mini Review
2003-05-03 by sceptre12345