Hello Jim, > I would like to ask about the processing of black and white film, > for ultimately scanning and printing on an ink jet printer. I am > curious as to what kinds of negatives produce the best results. I have used mostly Tri-X for years, usually exposing it at 180 or 200 and shortening the development time various amounts (D-76, HC-110 or Tmax developers) for enlarger printing. I've been scanning these negs for digital printing and have gotten my best results by increasing the exposure slightly above the scanner driver's default setting. So the bottom line for me has been that negs processed for good enlarger printing have also been excellent for scanning. As you would expect, however, you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. The greatest scanner in the world can't save a poor neg. Just as under the enlarger, the better the neg, the less work required. The principles are the same. What has been really interesting for me is that the same the qualities of the films that we like for enlarger printing make it through the digital process. There is a certain "look" about Tri-X prints that I have always loved, and that look is transmitted through the neg scans into my digital prints. My digi prints have the same "Tri-X look" as their enlarger brethren, which pleases me greatly. This is a subject I don't see discussed, and one question that I have is whether we will all be sacrificing the particular "look and feel" of our favorite film/developer combinations if/when we begin using digital cameras. I've have only used el cheapo digi cams so I can't test it myself, but I suspect that even with top notch cameras my favorite Tri-X look will be replaced by a generic "homoginized" look and feel, influenced by the particular lens and camera software (not to mention losing the ability to get different effects by using other films/developers for particular purposes). The one time I asked someone I got back a quick thoughtless answer to the effect of "not to worry, with Photoshop you can make your pics look like anything you want". Well, I suspect there is more to it than that. I once played with an add-on tool that gives you various "filters" to supposedly emulate the look of different films. It was a step in the right direction, but I found there is a lot more going on than just the gray scale balance. I hope this is halpful and some good food for thought. Regards, Clayton Info on black and white digital printing at http://www.cjcom.net/digiprnarts.htm
Message
Re: film processing
2003-05-14 by Clayton Jones
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.