Gareth- There is more than the usual hostility toward LSG inks here today <g>. Like many other options for BW printing, it seems to work great for some, worse or not at all for others. I've been using LSG with a CIS system in an 1160 for over a year and have made some wonderful prints with it. no metamerism and fade tests show it to be more permanent than epson oem ink. As with all inks, the ink/paper combo will often determine one's satisfaction with the ink. Lyson SG is generally clog free. That said, it can be somewhat quirky and there is no really usable WYSIWYG workflow, so some of the toning is really trial and error. What ever ink you go with, I would strongly urge you to try a few carts first (even if the air bubbles are a problem with the carts, you will be able to see what the ink looks like on papers you like). As you can see from other posts...mileage may vary <g>. cheers, Tom O'Connell --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "garethlock4472" <gareth.lock@b...> wrote: > I am currently using Permajet VT Blax inks (rebranded MIS mono inks) > and am looking at a CIS; either the Lyson system (small gamut) or the > Permaflow VT Blax(MIS rebranded). > > What I am looking for is some comparisons between the 2 such clogging > experiences and quality of the final image. I have been fairly > pleased with the VT balx apart from when I take the cartridge out it > introduces an air block which I cannot shift. > > Thanks > > Gareth > > www.imagesoflife.co.uk
Message
Re: MIS Inks vs Lyson Small Gamut
2003-06-07 by Tom OConnell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.