Dear friend: I have tried MIS VM inks and Lyson SG. I have to say that I didn't like at all MIS. Why: mainly because the restriction of not being able to print on glossy or pearl surfaces. They were but dead neutral with no metamerism. But I don't know the prints I made with MIS inks were so different to my traditional darkroom prints. And that's what I am looking for. Some people see the beauty of this new process as it's own. But I just try to get close to the traditional feel of a darkroom photograph. Lyson Small Gamut: Well very different inks that MIS VM. They suit perfect for glossy papers. No problems in here but download their profile for glossy and on epson printers always check on photo quality film whatever glossy paper you use. On the other hand you can tint your prints wich is really great, so you have always the tone you want. On the bad side: metamerism: yes the ugly beast is here again. Not so bad as with Epson OEM inks buty quite noticeable. And yes I have seen that on some papers photos turn green quite fast. Right now I will change to Ilford Classic because of that. I can tell you that this inks with ilford papers have totally the feeling of a traditional photo. But I am still looking that someday I will be able to print without metamerism on glossy papers and with excellent longevity. The moment is not here yet but the new piezography might be a great step in that direction Cristian --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "garethlock4472" <gareth.lock@b...> wrote: > I am currently using Permajet VT Blax inks (rebranded MIS mono inks) > and am looking at a CIS; either the Lyson system (small gamut) or the > Permaflow VT Blax(MIS rebranded). > > What I am looking for is some comparisons between the 2 such clogging > experiences and quality of the final image. I have been fairly > pleased with the VT balx apart from when I take the cartridge out it > introduces an air block which I cannot shift. > > Thanks > > Gareth > > www.imagesoflife.co.uk
Message
Re: MIS Inks vs Lyson Small Gamut
2003-06-08 by cristianbaitg
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.