Digital BW, The Print

Hi,

I am very happy too with my 2100 (European equivalent for the 2100).
For black and white it possibly is not the best choice.
(results are quite nice but I prefer the tones of Pizography prints I have seen).

Does anyone know when Piezography Quad inks will become available for the 2100/2200?

All the best,

Jo Brunenberg
www.jobrunenberg.com

DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com,Internet writes:
> Performance (particularly printing speed), reliability, and ease of\ufffd 
>switching carts (no need for a dedicated inkset CIS) is much better\ufffd 
>with the 2200.\ufffd With one additional light gray ink the 2200 would most\ufffd 
>likely surpass the 1280 for B&W print quality as well.\ufffd I also don't\ufffd 
>particularly care to maintain and feed two printers and currently I'm\ufffd 
>quite pleased with the 2200 for both color and B&W.
>
>Carl
>On Friday, July 25, 2003, at 02:45\ufffd PM, Mark Hahn wrote:
>
>> Now why exactly would you want to use a 2200 with 3rd party inks when
>> you can get the same performance from a 1280 for a fraction of the
>> price????
>>
>> mark
>>
>> ...
>>> Looks like both are very flexible, and will be able to use
>>> any quad- or hex-tone inksets that become available for the
>>> UltraChrome printers. Speaking of which, when will those
>>> actually become available (for those of us who don't want to mess
>>> with CIS or filling our own cartridges) ?
>> ...
>