..Snip... > > But, I don't think I made myself clear. I have some prints, maybe > 10% of my prints, that have areas of light silvery tones. This is > the region where ImagePrint puts down dots with blank paper in > between, whereas the PiezographyBW driver I'm using more or less > fills this space with light gray ink, obscuring the paper base. The > reflection off the paper base is whiter than off the light gray > ink. When placed across the room on a wall, these highlight areas > on the ImagePrint prints have more luminosity. And there is no > question about it...it's very easy to see. Now maybe this is not > the case with your custom PiezoTone printing approach...I can accept > this if you say so. And maybe it won't be the case with the new ICC > profiles. Ron, I agree with you! This special luminous quality is restricted to some images and under specific light condition. I see this also in BO printing. Use of pigmented grays in highlight areas impose the quality of inks, rather than allowing the paper to assert itself. A long time ago - 1.5 years;-) I was using dye based inks for b/w printing. And sure enough, the paper character was more readily apparent in the highlights. Too bad about color crossover and fade of color dyes. I am looking forward to the day when we get a dye based grayscale inkset, even one which has a limited lightfastness of 20 years. But that is just me. On the microbanding front: It should be noted that the Piezography plug-in is not the only way to go with the 1280. One can use the Epson driver along with the MIS FS (and FS-N) inks designated "E". Alternatively, you can use the regular FS (and FS-N) inks provided you switch the inks around as follows: cyan=magenta=dark, lightcyan=lightmagenta=middle, yellow=light. A moderate curves adjustment layer (call it profile) linearizes the response nicely. No plug-in, no banding. Also in fairness, I have seen a lot of prints made with the Piezo plug-in and PT inks with no evidence of banding. I personally don't use the plug-in because I like the ability to custom mix my own inks, and the plug-in (mis)uses too much ink, and it is slooooooooooooow! Regards. Shilesh
Message
Re: Image Print / 2200 vs 1280 / plug in
2003-07-26 by Shilesh Jani
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.