Carl Thanks again. You have really gone out of your way and I appreciate it. Thanks also for the clarification on the paper differences and ink types (I should have read my own posted reference further which has a good description of what Epson has done to the underlying Somerset Velvet from St Cuthberts Mill to give it a better dMax). I assume that the flaking they refer to with the Hahnemuhle paper is not too big an issue and well worth sacrificing for the deeper blacks etc ? You've got me wanting to give this paper a whirl... Cheers Steve --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield <scho@m...> wrote: > Steve, > > I dug around in my paper drawer and found an unused package of Somerset > Photo Enhanced paper (225 gsm). I believe this may be the same paper > you are using and it is #2 in the list of Somerset papers in the list > at the link you provided. I'm not sure if it is the "Velvet" or > "Textured" surface, since it was purchased a couple of years ago. The > surface looks very similar to the uncoated Somerset Velvet (250 gsm) > which I also have but haven't used. I profiled the SPE paper for QTR > 2.0 and uploaded the profiles to my filesharing site. The profiles are > in the "SPE.sit" archive, inside the QuadToneRIP2.0 folder. This paper > does not perform particularly well with the UC inks and it has a dmax > (1.51) even lower than BES (1.56). The blacks are not very deep and > also exhibit some mottling. This is not the same paper as the Epson > velvet fine art, which is reported to have a much higher dmax, closer > to that for EEM. The MIS Ultratone (UT) and Epson Ultrachrome (UC) > inks are both pigment inks. > > Carl > On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 08:12 PM, kiwikale wrote: > > > Hmmmm.....how would I find out the paper's dMax? If it is any help > > (UK to US) this > > paper is sold exclusively by Legion in the US as Somerset Photo > > Enhanced Velvet > > (there is also a Textured variation). I believe it is also the same > > paper as Epson > > Velvet Fine Art (not available in the UK). See: > > > > http://www.inkjetart.com/news/archive/IJN_11-05-02.html > > > > (This page raises another question - are the UT inks pigment or dye?) > > I am not at all > > familiar with Brightcube Eclipse Satine but am I right in assuming > > from the above > > article that the paper would be closer to Hahnemuhle Photo Rag? (which > > by the way > > costs at least twice as much as Somerset in the UK). > > > > Thanks again > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Carl Schofield > > <scho@m...> > > wrote: > >> Steve, > >> > >> I haven't used this paper, but if the dmax is relatively low try the > >> the BES profiles. The approximate relative dmax order for the three > >> paper profiles I made are EEM 1.70, HPR 1.64, BES 1.56. > >> > >> Carl > >> On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 04:19 PM, kiwikale wrote: > >> > >>> Many thanks to Roy for making all this hard work available and to > >>> Carl > >>> also for doing > >>> the 2200 profiles. I have just one question for Carl. Which of the > >>> three sets of paper > >>> profiles would you recommend for use with Somerset Enhanced Velvet > >>> from St > >>> Cuthberts Mill? > >>> > >>> Cheers > >>>
Message
[Digital BW] Re: QuadToneRIP new features
2003-08-03 by kiwikale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.