Daniel, The partition values seem to be too high. Do you have a scan of the second calibration chart, with the default ink limit set to 70 so we can see where you set the partition values? For comparison, take a look at Roy's default 1280-VM-GRAY descriptor file below. Carl N_OF_GRAY_PARTS=4 GRAY_INK_1=K GRAY_VAL_1=100 GRAY_INK_2=C GRAY_VAL_2=44 GRAY_INK_3=LC GRAY_VAL_3=22 GRAY_INK_4=Y GRAY_VAL_4=8 GRAY_INK_5= GRAY_VAL_5= GRAY_INK_6= GRAY_VAL_6= GRAY_INK_7= GRAY_VAL_7= GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=11 GRAY_SHADOW=11 GRAY_OVERLAP=50 GRAY_GAMMA=1 GRAY_CURVE= On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 07:30 AM, Daniel Staver wrote: > I got QTR2 on RedHat8 working last night. > > I'm using a 2100 with the MIS UltraTones and have a problem with the > profiling. I've followed the profiling process described in the > documentation and this is the result: > > http://daniel.staver.no/img/qtr2problem1.jpg > > It seems like one ink is reduced too much before the next one kicks in, > and I haven't really found any setting that helps. Using a very high > value for GRAY_OVERLAP improves the curve a little, but doesn't really > fix the problem. Using custom linearization values measured with my > densitometer also helps, but again, not enough to give me a completely > smooth curve. > > Any ideas what I can do to fix this? > > I'm using the K, C, LC and Y positions, with an ink limit of 70 and the > following values for each ink: > > GRAY_INK_1=K > GRAY_VAL_1=100 > > GRAY_INK_2=C > GRAY_VAL_2=72 > > GRAY_INK_3=LC > GRAY_VAL_3=51 > > GRAY_INK_4=Y > GRAY_VAL_4=17 > > GRAY_HIGHLIGHT=1 > GRAY_SHADOW=1 > > GRAY_OVERLAP=0 > GRAY_GAMMA=1 > > -- > Daniel Staver > http://daniel.staver.no
Message
Re: [Digital BW] QTR2 problem with MIS Ultratones and 2100
2003-08-07 by Carl Schofield
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.