Thanks Paul :-) I had seen this article before but not read thoroughly. I'm using MIS original archival inks (doing BW with black only for now), so if anything seems I should get even slightly better results than indicated. Unless of course your more cynical intuitions are borne out in full... =:-o Of course there's lots of discussion as to the validity of Wilhelm's testing methods in the first place. To me, how well these reflect 'real life' conditions is not especially pertinent. That the methods applied are applied consistently gives a very good _relative_ comparison across products, whatever the real life lifespan turns out to be. Even cutting the Wilhelm predictions in half, EEM is looking very good indeed for me right now. I'm not selling my work or submitting it to museums, however. BTW, I submitted this reply a couple days ago but it didn't seem to make it on to the forum. Hopefully this does... Peace, Sanaka --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > This is the Wilhelm page that has the new 110 year dark storage estimate for > EEM (and others): > > http://www.wilhelm-research.com/ep9600%20print%20permanence.html > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com > _____________________________________
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Epson Enhanced Matte & Wilhelm
2003-08-25 by Sanaka
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.