Hi I use an Olympus E20 for most of my event photography, and have on occasions been asked to do B/W prints. I find that I can usually get good 8x10s, but larger prints do depend on the subject and use of the print. Wide angle landscape work seems to show up the lack of detail the most. The picture of Old John in the 'converting colour to B/W' section of my web site <http://northlight-images.co.uk/bwfromcol.html> was done with an E20 and makes quite a good 8x10 print. A friend asked me to do him an 13"x19" print, which took quite a lot of work to get to an acceptable (to me) quality. The other picture on that page is of a friend in a late night fast food outlet, and produced a huge B/W print with no problem at all. At the moment, I still prefer scanned film for my B/W landscape work, but when a reasonably priced* 20Mpixel** SLR with a good wide angle lens (~24mm equiv) is around, I'm sure that my film SLRs will move to backup duty, although I suspect that this hypothetical 20M beast will not be anywhere as robust, light or durable as my old OM2/24mm :-)) I do my B/W prints from either source on an 1160 with Lyson SG inks bye for now Keith Cooper Northlight Images http://northlight-images.co.uk Photography - Digital Imaging - Apple Mac Consultancy Tel +44 (0)116 291 9092 Mobile +44 (0)780 162 9397 * A sum that varies with the amount of paid work I've got ;-)) - probably $2-4k ** 20M -- very arbitrary figure based on the amount of data from a good 35mm scan -- not intended to rekindle the film vs digital debate, which to my mind is very much Apples vs Oranges (I like both, I like eating fruit!)
Message
Re: digital cameras and qaud printing
2003-08-31 by Keith Cooper
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.