Chris, I've been using and liking the UT inks with Paul's curves on my 1280 very much. I switched from the VM inks and would like to go to a CIS someday. With the UT ink I get very smooth transitions through the entire range. I'm refilling my carts right now but am not crazy about it. I think it's kind of a pain to do. If I don't print every day or so I might have some clogging which is cleared up with no more than two or three cleanings. Like I said I love the ink and Paul's curves but there're a lot of new things developing out there so I'm leery about committing to CIS. Guess I'll keep refilling and trying new inks and workflows until I can be sure I have the best. Which is probably never. I bet I've been no help at all but bottom line for me is the UT inks and Paul's curves are the best yet. Tom --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Hargens" <chargens@s...> wrote: > Looking at the prices refurbished 1280s are going for, I've been > thinking it might worth getting one as a dedicated BW printer. I'd > like to go the UT route with the printer, but I haven't heard much > about what kind of results people are getting with Paul's curves. > (OTH, I've heard a lot of good things about the UT curves on the > 1160.) Also, it seems like clogging can be a problem with the 1280 > and the UT inkset. Any advice or suggestions on which way to go would > be appreciated. My other choice would be to get a 2200 and switch > between color and the UT set (filling my own carts). > > Chris Hargens
Message
Re: Quality of UT on the 1280
2003-10-04 by Tom Husband
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.