I never said it was a good idea, just that it was the official line at one time. :-) -----Original Message----- From: Anthony Atkielski [mailto:anthony@...] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 00:18 To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Win2k or XP? That was the official line, but I still advised users to put files on NTFS. I never saw much of a performance difference, and the transaction logs were really important (not to mention worth of some security protection as well). Better to get faster processors or drives than to resort to FAT just to get a tiny performance improvement.
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Win2k or XP?
2003-10-07 by Brentley Beerline