>Mike, >There is nothing wrong with what you are doing but you >might find it >more revealing if you print one of the many step wedges >available. > >Jerome >http://www.jeromehawkins.com/ Right you are, I should have thought of that. I'm a noob in the dark with this stuff, trying to retrofit curves from one printer to another. So far I have only applied the neutral curves to the test patterns. I combined "21-Step+.jpg", "100 step 1 line greyscale strip.jpg", "100-step wedge, 8bit, Grayscale.jpg", "OffsetGrad8.jpg" into one file and used that for the testing. What I have found is that the 1270 curves, both mac and pc, produce a pronounced stepped gradiant, with steps at 90% and 65%. The 1270 curves also are much flatter between 65-75% and 40-60%. The 1280 curves seem to be much better at spreading the range around, although a much less pronounced step is visible at 65% and 90%. The 1280 pc curve does not go pure white (that is, no ink) at 0%, while the 1280mac curve does. Interesting stuff. It takes a fine eye and lots of ink to get these right I imagine ;) I'll try the warm curves next, since those ones produces the most trouble in the output. Thanks for the help and pointers ;) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Message
Re: Quadtone Variable Mix and the Photo 900
2003-11-03 by gendem
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.