NEW! - FINE ART PHOTOGRAPHY GALLERY AND PIEZOGRAPY FORUM
2003-10-24 by artphotogallery
Yahoo Groups archive
Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC
Thread
2003-10-24 by artphotogallery
A site dedicated to aspects of fine art photography. The forum promotes understanding of photography and related media through collection, research, exhibition, and instruction. We identify and exhibit new work by emerging and well known artists from national, and international fine art photography communities. http://www.artphotogallery.org/
2003-10-24 by Tom Baker
This one is not spam. I just took a quick look. It's a very nice site. Tom Baker artphotogallery <artphotogallery@...> wrote: A site dedicated to aspects of fine art photography. The forum promotes understanding of photography and related media through collection, research, exhibition, and instruction. We identify and exhibit new work by emerging and well known artists from national, and international fine art photography communities. http://www.artphotogallery.org/ Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
2003-10-24 by Tim Atherton
> This one is not spam. I just took a quick look. It's a very nice site. > > Tom Baker > > artphotogallery <artphotogallery@...> wrote: > A site dedicated to aspects of fine art photography. > > The forum promotes understanding of photography and related media > through collection, research, exhibition, and instruction. Interesting questions of copyright though. I wonder whether they have permission from all the artists to have their work on their site? tim
2003-10-24 by Paul D. DeRocco
> From: artphotogallery [mailto:artphotogallery@...] > > A site dedicated to aspects of fine art photography. > > The forum promotes understanding of photography and related media > through collection, research, exhibition, and instruction. > > > We identify and exhibit new work by emerging and well known artists from > national, and international fine art photography communities. > > > http://www.artphotogallery.org/ Much better layout and user interface than before. Thanks. Although, "click for large exhibition print (40k)" is still a bit amusing. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paul mailto:pderocco@...
2003-11-03 by gendem
>Mike, >There is nothing wrong with what you are doing but you >might find it >more revealing if you print one of the many step wedges >available. > >Jerome >http://www.jeromehawkins.com/ Right you are, I should have thought of that. I'm a noob in the dark with this stuff, trying to retrofit curves from one printer to another. So far I have only applied the neutral curves to the test patterns. I combined "21-Step+.jpg", "100 step 1 line greyscale strip.jpg", "100-step wedge, 8bit, Grayscale.jpg", "OffsetGrad8.jpg" into one file and used that for the testing. What I have found is that the 1270 curves, both mac and pc, produce a pronounced stepped gradiant, with steps at 90% and 65%. The 1270 curves also are much flatter between 65-75% and 40-60%. The 1280 curves seem to be much better at spreading the range around, although a much less pronounced step is visible at 65% and 90%. The 1280 pc curve does not go pure white (that is, no ink) at 0%, while the 1280mac curve does. Interesting stuff. It takes a fine eye and lots of ink to get these right I imagine ;) I'll try the warm curves next, since those ones produces the most trouble in the output. Thanks for the help and pointers ;) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
2003-11-03 by gendem
>Mike, >There is nothing wrong with what you are doing but you >might find it >more revealing if you print one of the many step wedges >available. > >Jerome >http://www.jeromehawkins.com/ Right you are, I should have thought of that. I'm a noob in the dark with this stuff, trying to retrofit curves from one printer to another. So far I have only applied the neutral curves to the test patterns. I combined "21-Step+.jpg", "100 step 1 line greyscale strip.jpg", "100-step wedge, 8bit, Grayscale.jpg", "OffsetGrad8.jpg" into one file and used that for the testing. What I have found is that the 1270 curves, both mac and pc, produce a pronounced stepped gradiant, with steps at 90% and 65%. The 1270 curves also are much flatter between 65-75% and 40-60%. The 1280 curves seem to be much better at spreading the range around, although a much less pronounced step is visible at 65% and 90%. The 1280 pc curve does not go pure white (that is, no ink) at 0%, while the 1280mac curve does. Interesting stuff. It takes a fine eye and lots of ink to get these right I imagine ;) I'll try the warm curves next, since those ones produces the most trouble in the output. Thanks for the help and pointers ;) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
2003-11-03 by Paul Roark
MIS has posted a little tutorial for modifying curves that Dirk Hobman wrote (I edited and supplied some files and forms). It's in the MIS "What's new" tab at: http://www.inksupply.com/index.cfm?source=html/whatsnew.html It might be useful to you. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com ____________________________________
-----Original Message----- From: gendem [mailto:gendem@...] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:57 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Quadtone Variable Mix and the Photo 900 >Mike, >There is nothing wrong with what you are doing but you >might find it >more revealing if you print one of the many step wedges >available. > >Jerome >http://www.jeromehawkins.com/ Right you are, I should have thought of that. I'm a noob in the dark with this stuff, trying to retrofit curves from one printer to another. So far I have only applied the neutral curves to the test patterns. I combined "21-Step+.jpg", "100 step 1 line greyscale strip.jpg", "100-step wedge, 8bit, Grayscale.jpg", "OffsetGrad8.jpg" into one file and used that for the testing. What I have found is that the 1270 curves, both mac and pc, produce a pronounced stepped gradiant, with steps at 90% and 65%. The 1270 curves also are much flatter between 65-75% and 40-60%. The 1280 curves seem to be much better at spreading the range around, although a much less pronounced step is visible at 65% and 90%. The 1280 pc curve does not go pure white (that is, no ink) at 0%, while the 1280mac curve does. Interesting stuff. It takes a fine eye and lots of ink to get these right I imagine ;) I'll try the warm curves next, since those ones produces the most trouble in the output. Thanks for the help and pointers ;) __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/