Editor P.O.V. Image Service wrote: >In both cases though (QTR and IJC/OPM) I hate to tell the software >vendors/developers this, but I find it EXTREMELY unlikely that they will >have any product backing > > oops.... that should have read "direct inkset product backing." Sorry... As for QTR being free, I salute the creators of the software for doing so and I in No-Way denigrate the model they have chosen (I've been a HUGE proponent of the open-source model for a LONG time)... All I'm saying is that when all the software developers ignore a significantly larger installed OS base, they are missing a Golden opportunity. Additionally, as regards OPM/IJC, to say they had a Windows version "coming shortly" and to then halt development of that product is IMHO considerably short-sighted. The first vendor who offers a product that works like IJC/OPM or QTR on the WinTel platform will have a huge advantage over their rivals... That equals $$.. Keith Krebs "Just some guy," and caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys"
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Bowhaus development and IJC/OPM ("what the heck ARE they thinking?")
2003-11-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.