MIS recommends QTR or IJC/OPM on their website for using UT inks on a 2200. So I guess these systems do have some "inkset vendor/manufacturers support." But as lifelong Apple user I too experience the same frustrations in the "lack of cross development" arena. I just live with alternatives. OSX with its UNIX base has improved this a lot. Anyhoo Windoze users can use QTR with a Linux setup and a bunch of people on this list help each other out regularly with the Linux configuration so it is very possible. QTR is a labor of love on this list so jump in the water is warm. John E. --- "Editor P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@...> wrote: > Roger Sopher wrote: > > >Quite the diatribe - > > > > > Nope.. It's fact. Too bad if it's uncomfortable for > the vendor or some > of the end-user supporters of the products. > > >Just for the record, QTR works very well with OS X, > in fact was written > >specifically for OS X and moreover is a simple > installation and work > >flow. Printing from Wintel does require a Linux set > up but that is not > >particularly difficult either and produces quality > results. > > > And you expect inkset vendor/manufacturers to > support/recommend the > products based upon that option..? You must be > kidding Roy.. Speak to > the inkset vendor/manufacturer decision-makers > yourself and you'll hear > exactly what I'm repeating here.. > > The Linux on a WinTel network is a nice option.. > Unfortunately, it > relegates the products to a niche market within a > niche market.. Those > willing to go that route as a subset of those > pursuing quality B&W > output from Inkjets.. > > Additionally, AFAIK, setting up the box on a Linux > printer host/server > means you lose the Windoze EPSON printer driver > functionality > entirely... (Which may be an issue for some > potential end-users) > > >Considering > >that QTR is free for the asking and the author and > users are generous > >with help, neither QTR nor the author deserve your > comments. > > > > > Roger.. Feel free to read my original post SLOWLY. > The vast majority > of the negative commentary is directed at Bowhaus.. > Roy never promised > a WinTel version.. In fact, part of my point was > that AT LEAST QTR has > what IJC/OPM only promises (a working OS X) version. > [Admittedly, I was > mistaken in saying that it WILL likely have a sooner > OS X port.. it has > one already) > > > >I would suggest that you owe Roy Harrington an > apology. > > > > > Since I, in no way attacked Roy or QTR, I have not > intention of offering > such an apology.... > > > > > Keith Krebs > > "Just some guy," and caretaker of the Multiverse's > largest EPSON printer > User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets > and MegaDodo > Publications), at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ > > "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to > bang the rocks together > guys" > > > > > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Bowhaus development and IJC/OPM ("what the heck ARE they thinking?")
2003-11-16 by john eckenrode
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.