Roger Sopher wrote: >Quite the diatribe - > > > Roger, you've never been a fan of my critiques or criticisms... Let's just say that IMHO you have been more willing than many to generally uncritically accept and promote whatever the vendors/manufacturers choose to turn out... But leaving that aside... I think you need to head back to the Dictionary... from Webster's: \Di"a*tribe\ (?; 277), n. [L. diatriba a learned discussion, Gr. ?, prop., a wearing away of time, fr. ? to rub away, spend time; dia` through + ? to rub: cf. L. terere, F. trite: cf. F. diatribe.] A prolonged or exhaustive discussion; especially, an acrimonious or invective harangue; a strain of abusive or railing language; a philippic. The post was: 1) In no sense an exhaustive discussion. 2) Did not harangue nor attack. 3) Contained no abusive language. 4) Did not insult the subjects. It simply reported on the current state of the product offerings and questioned their choice to ignore WinTel support.. As far as QTR, Roy has NO responsibility to offer, nor has he promised a Wintel version - his product is free and does what it says. On the other hand, Bowhaus DID promise a product which appears not to be forthcoming anytime soon. Anytime a software developer does the latter (announcing forthcoming support and then shelving it) criticism is not just likely but they are fair game for such and should expect it. Keith Krebs "Just some guy," and caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo Publications), at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks together guys"
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Bowhaus development and IJC/OPM ("what the heck ARE they thinking?")
2003-11-16 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.