Digital BW, The Print

I imagine all the benefits of the 2000p are lost if
you are not printing large images.  Due to the latest
work of Paul - it would seem to be a better idea to
pick up a C82 while they are still available.




--- Mark Hahn <markhahn2000@...> wrote:
> I've been trying to sort this out myself... the
> price is soooo 
> compelling and it would be nice to have an archival
> color printer to 
> go with my quadtone 1160.  Anyone using a 2000p for
> color?  The bad 
> press seemed more geared for glossy paper while I
> found good press 
> with matte paper.  Anyone have more details?  If it
> is more an issue 
> of Epson not telling people that the inks don't work
> with glossy 
> papers it might be a minor point for me.  Hey, even
> the 2200 doesn't 
> do great job on glossy paper IMO.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> mark
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com,
> cpeacock@c... 
> wrote:
> > More to the point, considering the bad press to
> 2000P received; is 
> a 2000P a bargain at $200 (or at any price)?
> > 
> > Chuck Peacock
> 
> 


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree