>By making digital negatives with an inkjet printer, and taking them back >into the traditional wet darkroom, I have made many fine prints on >air-dried, glossy fiber paper. >With digital negatives, you have the best of both worlds. You have all of >the great silver papers that many have come to love, and you have the power >to modify and manipulate your images in Photoshop in ways that even the old >darkroom masters could not hope to achieve. Or is it the worst of both worlds. All the digital artifacts with the darkroom smells, non-buffered paper, non-washable gelatin coating, wavy paper from the water that needs dry mounting, questionable archival quality without strong toning that turns the print purple, ... You get the picture. ;) Seriously, I went this route once and, aside from temporary marketing advantages, I think the silver print is or should be considered an "alternative" process in the same category as the platinum print. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] The Holy Grail?
2003-12-12 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.