>I did not see it as any better than any of the other "workflows" >suggested around the Epson driver with Epson's OEM inks. What did >you find so "best" about it? I saw pretty much the same amount of >color casts and metamerism as I see usually. You saw pretty much the same? Are you sure you're following the workflow as outlined? The prints that result from my machine come out cool-neutral with good tonality and no color shifts across densities. There is some plugging up of shadows around 5%. And yes, there is some annoying metamerism but not nearly as much as, say, a color managed and profiled paper/printer/ink combo printed conventionally. Every method I've tried, with the exception of the Black Only method which to my eye is grainy, has color shifts. In other words 80% black will have a neutral tone but 50% black will go magenta and then 45% will be even more magenta then 30% will go neutral, and so on. This method doesn't result in that. Methods I've tried include Photoshop correction curves, color managed profiles, black only, and conventional Epson printing (and probably more). I totally agree that specialized inks and/or a RIP will yield far superior results, but those require additional purchases and are not stock.
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Grayscale printing on the Epson 2200
2003-12-12 by sanfo2003
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.