I should be very gratefull if you poste your profiles and intrucction to the files area manuel --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "nevnevsf" <nev@s...> wrote: > This is very interesting, indeed. It makes sense, though, that soft > proofing works. A profile contains two mappings, one from the color > connection space (PCS) into the printer space (if you want a > particular color, what set of RGB values should be sent to the > printer), and one from the printer space to the PCS (for each RGB > value sent to the printer, what color is produced). > > When you generate a profile using x-tone inks, the profile should > accurately represent the 2nd mapping, from the printer space to the > PCS. In other words, for a given RGB value sent to the printer, the > profile will know what grey tone is produced, since it measured it on > the target. > > When you soft proof, Photoshop figures out each RGB values it should > send to the printer for the set profile and rendering intent, then > uses the profile to figure out what color the printer should actually > produce. > > The tricky part with an x-tone profile is that the gamut of the > printer space (tones of gray) is much, much smaller that that of the > working space (such as Adobe RGB), so the success of a profile really > depends on how the profiler handles out-of-gamut colors. Apparently > Profile Prism handles them gracefully. A bad profile would freak out > when, say, bright green needs to be printed. a good profile would try > to squeeze it sensibly into the x-tone color space. For a Roark > workflow, the best situation would probably be to pass the RGB values > in the image directly to the printer, without color management, and to > use preview to see what the printer will produce. Passing the RGB > values would preserve the output part of the Roark workflow. That > seems to be your workflow as well. > > A better way to approach this would be to produce a custom profile > that does a partitioned PCS to x-tone mapping. For example, the > lightness (grey value of the image) could be carefully mapped with > proper ink partitioning, but the amount of tinting could be controled > by the a- and b- channels in the L*a*b* space (all that means is that > the color of the image would render the image cooler or warmer, but > the luminosity would determine how the gray inks are partitioned). > > Sorry if this was a bit technical and long. > > FYI, I have made just such a set of ICC profiles for the MIS-FS > Neutral inks on an 1160 printer on Enanced Matte and Crane Museo > papers. I had to write my own software to do it, but it finally works > well. I use a fully color-managed workflow and get very good, > consistent results, with highly accurate previews. I can even mimic > color filers, and see the effect on-screen! The inks are partitioned > to minimize the dot patterns. I imagine the profiles are similar to > the profiles produced by the Piezotone guys, but I found out about > their efforts after I was nearly done, and they don't seem to have > anything for MIS inks. > > I posted a very rough version of the profiles earlier in the year. If > anyone wants the profiles and instructions I can get them posted in > the Files area. Alas, I doubt that many people are using MIS FS > Neutral inks on an 1160 anymore, with these fancy Ultratones... > > I think I can profile just about any ink set, including Ultratones, > but it'd be months before I could get to it because I'd have to modify > the software to do full-color previews (right now it just does > previews of lightness, which works fine for a neutral inkset). If > anyone wants to contact me off-group, we can discuss it. > > A patchwork approach might be to try to imbed Paul Roark curves into a > profile, while using the profiler to generate the preview. That I > might be able to do faster. > > - Steven > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Editor P.O.V. > Image Service" <editor@p...> wrote: > > Ok, some years back when the VM-S set hit the streets, I wondered > aloud > > on this list about profiling it with a commercial profile package.. > > > > It created a stir, and I tried doing it with some then commercially > > available packages... Results were VERY disappointing and resulted > in > > huge amounts of posterization. > > > > Since then I've played with a bunch of products and had been having > > surprising success on color profiles with ProfilePrism of all > things.. > > I never even thought to try a "low-end product" like Profile Prism > on > > the previously uncompleted task of properly profiling the VM-S set.. > > > > Well, I've been a tad bored lately and was running a bunch of other > > tests, creating actions, etc., So, I figured, "what the hey, why > not > > give Profile Prism a shot at profiling the VM-S inkset?" > > > > Amazingly, it created a profile that is both usable for printer > > profiling and soft proofing (a necessary component to getting this > > right).. The workflow is pretty straightforward, but it works.. > Color > > me astonished. (I'm guessing that Profile Prism does more simple > point > > to point mapping and less interpolation as far as: rendering intent, > > smoothing, etc. - meaning a profile for something like this would be > > more likely to be usable) > > > > While some of the output still needs a tad bit of tweaking in the > > shadows (and that can be accomplished with a curve if necessary), > this > > workflow should allow split toning at will with the VM-S and VM > inksets, > > as well as perhaps the UltraTones... > > > > If there's interest, I'll put together a complete > workflow/explanation > > and send it to Martin Wesley to add to the group files.. > > > > > > > > Keith Krebs > > > > "Just some guy," caretaker of the Multiverse's largest EPSON printer > > User Community (highly recommended by Vogon Poets and MegaDodo > > Publications), at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EPSON_Printers/ > > and the Multiverse's largest Canon printer User Community at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon-printers > > "For the rest of you out there, the secret is to bang the rocks > together > > guys"
Message
Re: Success profiling MIS VM-S = a new alternative workflow
2003-12-23 by copal01
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.