Mark Hahn asked about scanning Tri-X. Mark, I have used two consumer scanners that handled Tri-X well. If you're shooting 120 roll film, the Epson 2450/3170/3200 will do a good job, at least if you put the filmstrip directly onto the glass, emulsion side down (to avoid Newton rings). It has a diffuse light source, that seems to yield pleasing results when scanning b+w negatives. Many have panned it as a tool for scanning 35mm film, but as I scan 120 roll film and 4x5 sheets, I cannot speak to that from experience. If you are willing to spend the extra money, the Microtek 120tf film scanner and its predecessor, the Polaroid 120 Sprintscan, both work really well with Tri-X and other b+w emulsions. Again, people who understand the machines attribute their ability to handle b+w films to the nature of their light source. I have an Epson 3200 as well as the Microtek, and each has its strengths, but both handle Tri-X quite nicely. I do not claim to be a pro, but if you visit my photographs at www.mcnew.net, all of them are scans of film from one or the other of these two machines (most of them with the Microtek), and most of them are shot onto Tri-X, developed mostly in HC-110. Sanders McNew www.mcnew.net [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Scanning Tri-X
2004-01-09 by sandersm@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.