>But does the UT 1 inkset run fine on thesse printers without the use >of an RIP or complicated software tweaks? That's what I'm trying to >get away from and what interests me about the very little I know about >the UT-2 inkset. Photoshop image adjustment curves are used to control the inks. The basic workflow is to edit in grayscale, save that file, then convert the image to RGB, apply the tone curve you want, print and delete the RGB file. >Perhaps a better question, for the benefit of those like me who have >no experience with either inkset, is: what exactly is easier about >using the UT-2 inkset v. the UT-1 inkset? I don't think the UT2 inkset is easier the way I use it. I continue to use curves to control printing. However, it will print in the medium tones without the use of curves. This opens up non-Photoshop applications, which is important to some. My interest in the inkset has more to do with the sepia end and its better glossy printing. Paul www.PaulRoark.com ______________________________ > >> the 7500/7000/9500/9000 all run UT fine. I use the 7000 driver even >> with the 7500, and that is what my curves were written for. >>Some Mac users report that they cannot get the 7000 driver to run >>the 7500. I'm not a Mac person, so I don't know why the system >>won't allow this. On PC one can manually set the printer & port.
Message
RE: [Digital BW] UT-2 inkset for wide format?
2004-01-15 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.