Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Colorburst RIP

2004-01-26 by Antonis

Steve,

thanks for sharing that. I wonder why the 2200 would have these problems 
when the large machine works fine. 
Didn't the 8-pass slow things down too much?

Antonis


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Steve Smith 
<photosmith@v...> wrote:
>  I have recently down loaded the trial version of the color burst rip and
> similar problems with banding on grayscale images on the 2200. The grayscale
> images printed on the 9600 were some of the best I have ever seen. Color on
> both machines exhibited banding in the shadows until I set the printer to
> its highest rez ( 8 passes ) it then went away and looked very good. I
> couldn't get rid of the banding for gray scale on the 2200 but I am very
> impressed with the performance of the 9600.
> 
> Steve Smith
> 
> 
> > Sanders,
> > 
> > why not download the free demo from
> > 
> > http://www.colorburstrip.com/
> > 
> > and give it a test drive.
> > 
> > I really haven't tested enough to make final pronouncements but my initial
> > finds are 
> > as follows:
> > 
> > - the grayscale support means better cmyk profiles for neutral prints from
> > grayscale 
> > files. I prefer partitioned workflows (where inks are assigned start/stop
> > positions 
> > along the gray scale)  , but could live with 6- or 7-channel  multichannel
> > files if that's 
> > what it took.  This isn't how CBurst works, and I haven't looked further to
> > see how a 
> > custom grayscale profile could be made.
> > 
> > - I printed a gray scale on a 2200 using the profiles that ship with the
> > current release, 
> > and while the gray hue was fine, there was unacceptable banding (some kind of
> > herringbone, not the kind that indicates bad nozzles). Yet, the printer had
> > good clean 
> > nozzle checks, the heads were recently aligned and the problem did not recurr
> > when I 
> > printed either through the Epson driver or OPM.
> > That to me was a deal-breaker. i didn't pursue tests any further but I hope
> > others try 
> > the demo so we can compare notes.
> > 
> > - I also briefly checked color printing and found shadows not open enough and
> > a 
> > funny dither (looking like fine vertical lines) that I wasn't crazy about. But
> > I know this 
> > part is completely subjective and a new profile could deal with shadow detail
> > better.
> > 
> > -Installing it on a G3 iBook (640 MB RAM) it was way slow for postscript. But
> > then, the 
> > min requirements call for a G4. As an RGB or grayscale printer, speeds were
> > decent 
> > for a G3/ jaguar.
> > 
> > It would be nice to see  a grayscale-capable, full scale RIP (like
> > StudioPrint) for OS X.
> > I wonder what others may have to say about this release (2.2) of Colorburst.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Antonis
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, sandersm@a... wrote:
> >> > I went back through the archives to see if anyone besides Robbe was using
> >> the 
> >> > Colorbust RIP and couldn't find any references to it.   Does anyone on the
> >> > list have any experience with it?   Any thoughts, observations?   I notice
> >> that 
> >> > its most recent revision for Macs, v2.2, came with release notes that cited
> >> > improved grayscale printing as a feature of the revision.
> >> > 
> >> > Sanders McNew
> >> > www.mcnew.net
> >> > 
> >> > 
> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as
> > they are often being updated.
> > 
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> > 
> > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to
> > unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same
> > page.
> > 
> > Please follow these basic guidelines:
> > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> > them short.
> > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames.
> > Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the 
membership
> > without notice.
> > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W
> > printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the
> > membership.
> > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and
> > guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and
> > Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/
> > 
> > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE 
PRINT
> > YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" 
AND
> > "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE 
TO YOU
> > FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR 
EXEMPLARY
> > DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, 
GOODWILL,
> > USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND 
"MODERATORS" OF
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY 
OF SUCH
> > DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL 
BW,
> > THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF 
YOUR
> > TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY 
ON THE
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING 
TO THE
> > DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > * To visit your group on the web, go to:
> > * http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
> > *  
> > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > * DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-
unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsub
> > scribe> 
> > *  
> > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.