>In summary, the 890 with OEM cartridges produces superior prints. If Kodak's estimation for print life is accurate we've got a fine paper here. The 2200 has issues that discourage me personally from exploring the paper further. < Joe, I don't think the paper is meant for pigment inks anyway so the 2200 result is to be expected. Paul Roark loves to fade test the paper as I understand it. Could you help him with some prints ? We all want to know whether the claims are true or just Kodak claims. Ernst
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Kodak's new 100 year paper.
2004-02-04 by Ernst Dinkla