Hi Steve, > This brings up a point I felt should be made about the Nikon; That > LED light source is adjustable over a two-stop range, something no > fluorescent tube scanner can do. Hum...well, my scanner can simply stop down, or open up the lense aperture if I want. It\ufffds a cold cathode tube, not fluorescent...but same difference. So, I have a many stop range I can use...but have found absolutely no need to. The other thing that most any scanner can do is MTF over the flat field, and simply stopped down enough so you don\ufffdt have any depth of field problems... > Dropping the 'analog gain' (why > they chose to name it something so un-enlightening is a mystery) .5- > 1.0 stops takes care of that clipping and compression, centers up > the data, and allows you to go directly to positive without loss. Why can not the exact same results be achieved by adjusting the exposure time? All you are doing is moving the data on the curve up or down, by adjusting either exposure/aperture/light source. Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Scanning Negs
2004-02-20 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.