My thanks to Doug and Casper for this info; I'll probably start with the Pictorico first, if it works well I'll report back Steve Karafyllakis > Don Burkholder now recommends Pictorico High Gloss White Film (at least for the 2200). I > am using it and find it is better than the OHP material. Unfortunately it is expensive. Be > sure to use photo-black vice matte-black ink on the 2200. > > I have never experienced the banding you are getting with either the OHP or white film > paper, but I don't have a 1280. > > Doug Nielsen > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Steven Karafyllakis" <steve@s...> > wrote: > > I tried the Pictorico Overhead transp. film in my 1280 a while back, > > but wasn't too thrilled with the results; the film had obvious > > (under a loupe) banding, where the same file on paper was completely > > smooth and clean. So I'm wondering if anyone has come up with a > > better alternative? I seem to remember mention of some kind of > > synthetic paper/backlight film, has any one had any success with > > that? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Steve Karafyllakis > > > >
Message
Re: Digital negs rivisited
2004-03-19 by Steven Karafyllakis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.