Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Digital negs rivisited

2004-03-19 by Steven Karafyllakis

My thanks to Doug and Casper for this info; I'll probably start with 
the Pictorico first, if it works well I'll report back

Steve Karafyllakis


> Don Burkholder now recommends Pictorico High Gloss White Film (at 
least for the 2200). I 
> am using it and find it is better than the OHP material. 
Unfortunately it is expensive. Be 
> sure to use photo-black vice matte-black ink on the 2200. 
> 
> I have never experienced the banding you are getting with either 
the OHP or white film 
> paper, but I don't have a 1280.
> 
> Doug Nielsen
> 
> 
> --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Steven 
Karafyllakis" <steve@s...> 
> wrote:
> > I tried the Pictorico Overhead transp. film in my 1280 a while 
back, 
> > but wasn't too thrilled with the results; the film had obvious 
> > (under a loupe) banding, where the same file on paper was 
completely 
> > smooth and clean. So I'm wondering if anyone has come up with a 
> > better alternative? I seem to remember mention of some kind of 
> > synthetic paper/backlight film, has any one had any success with 
> > that?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Steve Karafyllakis
> > 
> >

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.