Good Morning JackG! Thanks for posting the insights and your experience. Portrait photographs done by commercial portrait studios seem to fall into a category all by themselves. The standards and practices are vastly different from the bulk of traditional B&W photographers or even the "Fine Art" photographers. There is cross-over of course because some people do all three. Given your experience with "commercial" coating of large (I assume 16x20 or so) images done by a third party (pro lab?) why do you continue to avoid glass? I follow your experience below..but it would seem to beg for glass if you have to replace photos that were damaged by externals or even coatings. Steadman ----- Original Message ----- From: JackG To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 6:51 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Glass vs. Coating Good Morning Steadman, While all of the color prints we sell are coated, it is not for U.V. protection. When we started doing/having this done years ago, the manufacturer claimed U V protection. Years later they retracted or at least did not make those claims any more. I recommend people not use glass on most of the color portraits we sell. Of course we tell people that we guarantee our prints.........had to replace one because of a child poking a ball point pen on it, so glass has it's place. Now B&W silver prints are a different story if extensive retouching has been done. On inkjet prints, I definitely feel they need protection of some sort, I agree with you that glass is probably the best. As you recall, I have had very, very bad things happen with prints other than color that have been sprayed. Regards, John in Okc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steadman Uhlich" <steadmanuhlich@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 11:37 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Glass vs. Coating : Yeah...I have an opinion on this very subject.... : : I think the coating idea is a good one for certain effect and certain needs. : : However, I believe (and it is a gut feeling) that it would be better to put most Piezo prints behind UV blocking glass. I checked tonight and the manufacturer of my glass states 97% UV rays blocked. I bet that is better than a typical home sprayed on misting of a polymer that has "some" UV agents in it. : <big snip> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Glass vs. Coating
2001-10-16 by Steadman Uhlich
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.