Randy Rancier wrote: >One of the things that is really attracting me to this software >besides the cost, is that it sounds like PW gives you the control >and flexibility you need with curves, and tools simuliar to the >channel mixer and other tools, one needs with B&W printing that you >don't get with Elements or Microsofts product; I am familiar with >Elements. Also it appears that PW is simplier to use with less of a >learning curve; any comments on this? I have found PWP to be fairly easy to learn. Easier than PS. And I can't say enough about their user forum. You can usually get a question answered by the program's author within a few hours. I do think the interface is not always as polished as I would like. It looks like some enhancements have been "tacked on" over the years. But they work. It's a "form follows function" interface to be sure. However, there is commonality across most functions' interfaces, so once you figure out the flow, it carries across to most everything. -Don M
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Picture Windows opinion
2004-05-16 by Don M
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.