Richard, Although I do like the 1160 -- its a classic, it does have a small drop size which is why the test comes out so smooth. Reliability is a different issue. Roy --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Richard Smallfield <r.smallfield@p...> wrote: > Hi, > I've had to retire a 1200 printer from using UT1 inks, because it was so hard to keep the inks flowing. > > The HP 7660 is brilliantly reliable, but I miss A3 Photo Rag prints. > > After seeing Roy Harrington's print comparison page (thanks a lot Roy), I've started wondering whether an 1160 might be a more reliable alternative, because of the larger droplet size - and I'd definitely use it with a CFS. > > (I found that most of my ink problems started when I changed carts - I couldn't get the ink going again - so a CFS must surely be easier.) > > Is an 1160 likely to be much more trouble-free than a 1200? I can't afford the time I spent tinkering with the 1200 trying to keep it going. > > thanks, > Richard > -- > http://smallfield.vze.com > http://photos.smallfield.vze.com > > "There are only two truly infinite things, the universe and stupidity. > And I am unsure about the universe." > --Albert Einstein
Message
Re: 1200 v 1160 - inkflow reliability
2004-05-22 by Roy Harrington
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.