Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] a question for Nikon 8000 users

2004-05-26 by Anthony G. Atkielski

mkitei writes:

> I just got an 8000, and wanting to see just how fine a superfine scan could be,
> I tried a 16x.

Superfine scans simply use a single line of the three-line CCD.  It
prevents banding in high-contrast scans, but it takes three times as
long as a regular scan.  Nikon should have called "superfine" scans
"regular" scans and "normal" scans "high-speed" scans.

The 16x is overkill in just about every conceivable case.

> What settings do you use for optimum ( a time vs. quality equasion)
> results.

In almost all cases, I leave superfine scanning off, and I use 2x
sampling at most. Digital ICE is on for color or chromogenic (C-41) B&W,
off for true black and white; I never use anything but the lowest
setting.  GEM is never on.

For some slides, especially Velvia slides of contrasty subjects and
night shots, I use the superfine mode to avoid any visible banding.  In
most other scans, the normal mode is fine.  Banding is occasionally
visible in high-contrast true B&W scans; it's rare (I don't recall ever
seeing it) in any kind of C-41 negative scan, since the contrast of
color negatives is so low to begin with.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.