mkitei writes: > I just got an 8000, and wanting to see just how fine a superfine scan could be, > I tried a 16x. Superfine scans simply use a single line of the three-line CCD. It prevents banding in high-contrast scans, but it takes three times as long as a regular scan. Nikon should have called "superfine" scans "regular" scans and "normal" scans "high-speed" scans. The 16x is overkill in just about every conceivable case. > What settings do you use for optimum ( a time vs. quality equasion) > results. In almost all cases, I leave superfine scanning off, and I use 2x sampling at most. Digital ICE is on for color or chromogenic (C-41) B&W, off for true black and white; I never use anything but the lowest setting. GEM is never on. For some slides, especially Velvia slides of contrasty subjects and night shots, I use the superfine mode to avoid any visible banding. In most other scans, the normal mode is fine. Banding is occasionally visible in high-contrast true B&W scans; it's rare (I don't recall ever seeing it) in any kind of C-41 negative scan, since the contrast of color negatives is so low to begin with.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] a question for Nikon 8000 users
2004-05-26 by Anthony G. Atkielski
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.