Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] a question for Nikon 8000 users

2004-05-26 by Ernst Dinkla

mkitei wrote:

> I just got an 8000, and wanting to see just how fine a superfine scan could be, 
> I tried a 16x. I watched the progress window for a while then packed a bunch 
> of equipment for a location shoot, watched a little longer then went home and 
> had lunch, came back and watched some more, sent a few faxes and did 
> some housekeeping. Then I watched some more. The scan was excellent. So 
> was the one I got from 4x in a fraction of the time. What settings do you use for 
> optimum ( a time vs. quality equasion) results. End use is best print I can 
> make. 
> 
> Mike

Color negatives 2x to 4x sampling with the normal scan of 
NikonScan. ICE included. But most of the time I use Vuescan with 
the same settings and that means superfine scan by default.

For slides and B&W negatives with Vuescan: 2x sampling + long 
exposure (which uses a different 2x sampling). That gives more 
shadow detail.  Vuescan uses superfine only.

MF wetmounted, 35 mm usually not.

Ernst

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.