Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Lightjet for b&w

2004-07-22 by Richard Coda

I have investigated all the digital BW workflows. My thoughts:

If you go LightJet you are sacrificing longevity. Remember it is 
either a B/W print on color paper, or a B/W print on RC garbage. 
Either way you lose down the road. Also, the paper surfaces distract 
me.

The only two other alternatives that are, IMHO, worth the effort are:

1. Inkjet (Piezo or other) on high-quality paper. I love the look of 
B/W matte prints from inkjet. And they are fairly archival.

2. Have a digital negative made (not an inkjet negative - I found 
them to be of unacceptable quality). Either an imagesetter negative 
(www.atxstudio.com is a good source) or from a LVT or Rhino. These 
can then be printed conventionally in a wet darkroom. Nothing beats 
the look of a fiber silver print.

Rich
www. rcodaphotography.com

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.