--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@y...> wrote: > Thank you Tyler. That was an excellent description of the difference between icc profiles > and patches used for quad output. I'm saving all this useful information. This makes me > feel better about trying the UT pigments through QTR. Since you are such an expert with > all this, if you don't mind me asking, what inkset are you using now? I use PiezoTones, in various combinations. I'm afraid I can't tell you anything about UT from experience. > These carbon > pigments seem fairly close in composition from what I've read around here and there > certainly is a price difference, especially in the beginning. Not sure how similar they really are, and it would be very difficult to verify. How they print, how problem free they are, and how they hold up is probably more important than how close they are chemically. Issues like support and consistancy come into play as well when it comes to prices. Relationships are an important part of these decisions for me as well. > I went to your website. Your work if very nice. Seattle is such a great town. I visited there > and was either going to move there or here in Atlanata, but ended up here. My brother > lives in Portland. Well, your brother and I are way too stinkin' hot right now, let me tell you. That was just a little page with commercial work, some of the things I use quad printing with are here- http://www.tylerboley.com/landscapes/index.htm Thanks for giving me an openning for a plug. Tyler
Message
Re: So it's not rocket science
2004-07-23 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.