Andre, I have tried dozens of developers with TP, and I think Kodak has the others beat when all the various factors are taken into account. I'm usually not inclined to pay a big company monopoly rent, but in this case, I gave up and think it is worth it to use Technidol. Paul www.PaulRoark.com _______________________ -----Original Message----- From: Andre [mailto:am1000@...] Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 10:34 AM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Digital BW] Re: OT - controlling tech pan contrast Paul, Thanks for sharing your findings. My previous experience (several years ago) with TP were with Rodinal (maybe not the best choice for scanning) and FG-7 plus Sodium Sulfite with which I was able to get better tonality than Rodinal. Maybe I should take a look at TP with Technidol. Cheers, Andre --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > Andre, > > Contrary to my original response, I found that I had done the comparisons > between Tmax 100 in Xtol and Tech Pan in Technidol (the results were on my > old computer). > > I can't say whether one would see a major difference in an enlargement, but > the TP image quality was significantly better on the monitor when scanned > images of my standardized test targets were viewed. The straighter curve of > TP in Technidol scanned better in my workflow, which includes scanning > negatives as positives. The grain of TP was somewhat finer, but this is not > where the big difference was. The resolution was about the same for the > scanned images. However, the most noticeable difference was the sharpness > and clarity of the fine detail of the TP. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > _____________________________ Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. Please follow these basic guidelines: - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. Yahoo! Groups Links
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: OT - controlling tech pan contrast
2004-07-25 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.