Chuck- I don't know anyone who uses Studio Print for the 4000. If you look at what you get, it isn't really that much more than Image Print (it looks like it includes ink and a gretag calibrator of some sort)...but why would you convert a 4000 to BW only??? And switching back and forth would be at a cost of more than $100 in ink to flush, so not really an option. As for image print. There is no solution that totally elimintes metamerism. That is why IP comes with profiles based on lighting the print will be viewed in. However, if you stick with matte papers, the amount of metamerism is virtually non-existant (I don't even bother with any profile but daylight and I get stunning results that I mainly view under tungsten). With some glossy papers, there is a very slight to significant bronzing. Some people don't even notice it, some hate it. If framed and veiwed head on, it is invisible, even in the worst cases. You don't say whether you are mac or windows...but I assume windows (if mac, search archives here for QTR and other mac solutions). For me the Image Print choice was a no brainer...color, BW (and toning) and great support (I already knew that from the 2200). If you buy the version 5.6, you will get a free upgrade to the 6.0 for windows whenever it is available. cheers, Tom O'Connell
Message
Re: 4000 RIP Advice, Please
2004-08-21 by Tom OConnell
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.