Digital BW, The Print

Mike, I also am moving up from a 1280 but am debating between the 7600 and the 4000. What has been your experience in print quality and reliability with the 7600. Most ( 70%)_ of my fine art work is 16x20 Another 25 % would be 24: wide by xx. the remaining 10% over 24" wide. I believe the 9600 could not be economically justified but am hovering between the 4000 and the 7600. Any comments on your experience would be most appreciated.
Alan Zimmerman
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Michael B. Askew 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 1:05 PM
  Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Printer recommendations, please


  Well, there is a significant difference between the 1280 and the 
  2200.  The inks in the 2200 are the Ultrachrome pigmented inks, not 
  the older epson inks which change color under different lighting 
  (metamorism).  In addition, with the 2200, you get both a black ink, 
  and a light grey ink, giving you much better tone control of both 
  color and greyscale images.  If you plan to print greyscale images, 
  or slightly toned images, you should definitely go the 2200 route.

  Now, if you can afford it, and want to get up to 16x20 prints, the 
  state of the art printer on the market today is the Epson 4000.  
  With the 2200, you have to choose between matte black and photo 
  black inks.  If you're printing on glossy or semi gloss paper, you 
  would use the photo black.  On matte, the matte black ink.  You can 
  use either one for either paper, but the profiles cover one or the 
  other and you just don't get such deep blacks with the photo black 
  ink on matte paper, but it prints and you might not notice unless 
  you're a perfectionist, or comparing prints side by side.  I notice 
  the difference, but you can make it work.  On the 4000, it holds 
  both the matte black and the photo black ink, solving that choice 
  problem.  It knows by the paper you choose which ink to use.

  If I were getting a new printer today, I'd do the 4000.  I have a 
  7600 and might add the 4000 just so I don't have to switch inks and 
  could print on other papers.  But on the other hand, I really like 
  the matte papers.  Took me a while to get used to them, but now I'm 
  converted.

  If I couldn't afford the 4000 (it's quite expensive at 1795), I'd do 
  the 2200.  If I couldn't afford the 2200, I'd wait till I could.

  Mike Askew
  www.michaelbaskew.com









  --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Kathy Ryan" 
  <kt.ryan@v...> wrote:
  > Good morning....
  > 
  > I have been trying to follow the discussions here as a way of 
  learning more about B&W digital printing. I admit I'm pretty much 
  lost on lots of the technical details regarding inks, curves, QTR, 
  RIP and the other acronyms floating around. But I'm learning!
  > 
  > I currently have an Epson RX500 all-in-one that I use to print my 
  photos. They are pretty good but I want better and bigger. I would 
  like to print up to 11x14 which is what my preferred size was in the 
  wet darkroom. And I would like to get rid of, or at least control, 
  the slight color cast I get on the RX500 prints.
  > 
  > I'm looking at the Epson 1280 and 2200; they both print the size I 
  want and I can get the MIS inks for them, too. The price difference 
  has me leaning toward the 1280 but if there is significant 
  improvement by going with the 2200, I would consider that option.
  > 
  > Any advice you have to offer will be appreciated.
  > 
  > Kathy
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



  Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated.

  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint

  If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page.

  Please follow these basic guidelines:
  - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
  - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice.
  - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership.
  - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See "Group Topic, Rules and Guidelines" in the Files section:
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/

  BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE  "OWNER" AND "MODERATORS" OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP.



        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 
              ADVERTISEMENT
             
       
       


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Yahoo! Groups Links

    a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/
      
    b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      
    c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]